Canon's RF f2.8L lenses are only as expensive as Nikon's Z lenses. 100 more 100 less. Only unique Canon RF lenses like 50mm f1.2 and 28-70mm f2.0 are expensive but they don't have a rival in the market yet. Plus, Canon 35mm f1.8, 85mm f2.0 and 24-105mm f4-7.1 lenses are quite inexpensive. I think Nikon wins on body prices today, not lens prices. Nikon AF-S Nikkor 70-200mm f/2.8G ED VR Nikon AF-S Nikkor 24-70mm f/2.8G ED Nikon AF Nikkor 85mm f/1.4D Nikon AF Nikkor 105mm f/2D DC Nikon AF Nikkor 135mm f/2D DC +17 more Reply Reply with quote Reply to thread Complain See my Nikon 24-70mm f2.8E VR review. Sony offers different versions of a 24-70mm f2.8 zoom but their latest is the FE 24-70mm f2.8 GM. The lens does not offers its own image stabilization so you need to rely on the built-in stabilization featured in recent Sony bodies. It is sold for around 2060 EUR. See our Sony FE 24-70mm f2.8 GM review-in 2. Vignetting. Even though the Nikon Z 28-75mm f/2.8 is an f/2.8 lens, it arguably beats the 24-200mm f/4-6.3 in vignetting performance! The vignetting performance of the 24-200mm f/4-6.3 VR is pretty suspect, especially at 24mm. Even though the 24-200mm f/4-6.3 VR improves dramatically at 35mm and beyond, the ridiculous levels of vignetting at Following is a comparison with the Sigma 24-70mm f2.8 OS Art, the Nikon 24-70mm f2.8E VR and the Tamron SP 24-70mm f2.8 VC (1st generation). The Sigma was shot on a D810 with an older, less contrasty print of the test-target and a little less sharpening of 35/0.5/36/10: Above: Tamron 24-70mm f2.8 VC G2 on D850 at 24mm, f2.8 I compared this lens to the nikkors 17-55 2.8, 24-85 3.5-4.5, and 24-50 3.3-4.5, to the Sigma's 24-70 2.8 EX DF and 15-30 3.5-4.5 EX and to the tamron 90mm 2.8 SP macro. The Sigma's are soft at the edges unless heavily stopped down and had less contrast overall than the Nikkor 24-85. Above: Nikon 24-70/2.8E ED VR on a D810 at 70mm, f2.8, 64 ISO. Above: Nikon 24-70/2.8G ED on a D800 at 70mm, f2.8, 100 ISO. Above: Tamron SP 24-70/2.8 VC on a D800 at 70mm, f2.8, 100 ISO. When compared to its predecessor and its main competitor the new lens shows the best FX-corner of the bunch. And at the shorter focal lengths by a large margin! In this comparison we’ve tested the Sony against the equivalent Canon and Nikon rival models. We’ve chosen the higher resolution 50-Mpix Canon EOS 5DS R to highlight the potential of the Canon combination, but even when tested on the lower 22-Mpix resolution Canon EOS 5D Mark III, the EF 24-70mm F2.8L II still achieves peak sharpness levels similar to the Sony. .

nikon 24 70mm f2 8 vr review